Comments on: Les Grandes Lignes du Programme d’Accession à la Propriété http://montrealrealestateblog.com/les-grandes-lignes-du-programme-d%e2%80%99accession-a-la-propriete/ A daily dose of the local market. Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:50:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: john http://montrealrealestateblog.com/les-grandes-lignes-du-programme-d%e2%80%99accession-a-la-propriete/#comment-1349 john Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:56:52 +0000 http://montrealrealestateblog.com/?p=227#comment-1349 Wonderful and informative web site.I used information from that site its great.- Wonderful and informative web site.I used information from that site its great.-

]]> By: Patrick http://montrealrealestateblog.com/les-grandes-lignes-du-programme-d%e2%80%99accession-a-la-propriete/#comment-613 Patrick Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:30:12 +0000 http://montrealrealestateblog.com/?p=227#comment-613 Thank you for your website, I have just discovered it and it's quite informative. I have a question relating to this program. I was visiting condos in Little Italy last week. They were all conversion of industrial buildings. Most of the developers told me the unites were not admissible to the first-time buyer credit, while others (including 7140 Alexandria) said they were. One argument was that it depended on the type of warranty (APCHQ or another one that I forgot). What's you view on this? When are conversion projects admissible to the City credit, and when are they not? Thank you, Patrick Thank you for your website, I have just discovered it and it’s quite informative.

I have a question relating to this program.

I was visiting condos in Little Italy last week. They were all conversion of industrial buildings. Most of the developers told me the unites were not admissible to the first-time buyer credit, while others (including 7140 Alexandria) said they were.

One argument was that it depended on the type of warranty (APCHQ or another one that I forgot).

What’s you view on this?

When are conversion projects admissible to the City credit, and when are they not?

Thank you,

Patrick

]]>